LDDA - The Liberal Democrat Disability Association

Representing those with disabilities within and outside the Lib Dems

Sacked worker gets record damages

8.17.00am UTC (GMT +0000) Mon 12th Nov 2007

A sacked London park worker has been awarded record compensation of £550,000 because he was the victim of disability discrimination. The man, who suffers learning difficulties, was unfairly sacked from his job by Lambeth Service team, an employment tribunal in Croydon found.

His compensation comprises loss of earnings until retirement. He was one of 24 members of the GMB union who had claimed they had been unfairly dismissed. He was 34 years old when he lost his job.

The claimants were all gardeners and had tended parks throughout the London Borough of Lambeth, including Clapham Common. In total the group was awarded compensation of £1.3m.

Richard Ascough, GMB regional secretary, said he was "delighted" with the ruling, as his members had "been very shoddily treated by the employer after many years of loyal service".

The hearing was told that the employer had used a system for selecting personnel for redundancy which was weighted against disabled workers as it focused on the numbers of days of absence, and whether staff drove a car or not.

A spokesman for the GMB union said the scale of the awards was so large, it was now considering whether to re-open other recent cases involving claims of disability discrimination.

Service team Serviceteam has since been bought by Veolia Environment Services Lambeth.

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook LibDigLibDig redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story.
Comment on this news story.
Previous news story: Training college cuts workforce (Mon 12th Nov 2007).
Next news story: Peer calls for ADHD care review (Thu 15th Nov 2007).

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
Published and promoted by LDDA - The Liberal Democrat Disability Association, 4 Cowley Street, London SW1P 3NB.
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.